Akta Perihal Dagangan (Akta ), Peraturan-Peraturan dan Perintah- Perintah & Trade Descriptions Act (Act ), Regulations and Orders ( Hingga. (PERAKUAN DAN PENANDAAN HALAL) AKTA PERIHAL DAGANGAN [Akta ], Menteri membuat perintah yang berikut. PERINTAH PERIHAL DAGANGAN (TAKRIF HALAL) PADA menjalankan kuasa yang diberikan oleh seksyen 28 Akta Perihal Dagangan.
|Published (Last):||7 June 2014|
|PDF File Size:||17.53 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.51 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Unique Creations Sdn Bhd v. Firstly, the jurisdiction of enforcement agencies will be discussed throughout this paper. Guarantee – Notice of demand – Whether plaintiff’s letter of demand only an identification document – Whether converted into a court exhibit – Whether plaintiff could rely on document to prove that proper demand was made – Statement of account, whether sent to 4 th defendant.
Keywords Consumer, law, halal, foods product, syariah. Sharikat Permodalan Kebangsaan Bhd v. Banishment Repeal Bill Money Services Business Act Cap dagangan – Permohonan perintah perihal dagangan – Perlanggaran cap dagangan dalam perjalanan perdagangan – Cap dagangan berdaftar “Squiggles” bagi barangan roti – Sama ada penggunaan peihal “Squiggle” oleh perayu bagi barangan rotinya melanggar cap dagangan berdaftar “Squiggles” – Sama ada perintah perihal dagangan boleh diberikan – Sama ada perintah perihal dagangan boleh diberikan terus secara ex parte – Sama ada dagagan penggunaan suci hati cap dagangan berdaftar dalam tempoh statutori yang ditetapkan – Sama ada perintah bagi penghapusan cap dagangan berdaftar boleh diberikan – Sama ada perayu seorang terkilan – Sama ada tarikh penggunaan sesuatu cap dagangan oleh seseorang pengguna berdaftar boleh dikuatkuasakan kebelakangan – Akta Perihal Dagangans.
AKTA PERIHAL DAGANGAN 2011(AKTA 730)
Sale and purchase agreement – Illegality – Allegation of – Whether consequently, financing agreement signed by appellants with respondents void and of no effect – Whether duty on respondents as loan providers to ensure SPA free from legal infirmities – Whether SPA and financing agreement two distinct and separate contracts – Whether finance agreement valid regardless of alleged illegality of SPA – Whether respondent acted in pari delicto – Contracts Acts.
Appeal – Appeal against conviction and sentence – Finding by Sessions Court Judge that respondent raped victim – Finding based on credibility of witnesses – Other facts taken into account consistent with Judge’s findings – Whether Sessions Court Judge correct in finding that prosecution had proven its case beyond reasonable doubt. Abstract Perihl enforcement agency is one of the bodies that responsible for the issue of halal.
This paper focuses on the jurisdiction of the enforcement agencies pertaining to halal matters. Then this paper will analyze the procedures and statutory provisions as to see whether all the processes and current legislations are protecting the consumers on halal food consumption.
National Wages Consultative Council Act National Sports Institute Act Action – Limitation – Issue of – Claim for damages – Applicant’s failure to deliver vacant possession within prescribed period – Section 16N 2 b Housing Developers Control And Licensing Act – Interpretation and import – Whether could override time-barred limitation on s.
Trial – Competence of witness – Child witness – Corroboration – Whether child understood nature of oath – Whether there was misdirection leading to failure of justice – Evidence Acts. Adverse inference – Non calling of material witness – Witness arrested together with accused not called by prosecution in drug case – Whether gap caused in prosecution’s case – Whether adverse inference should be invoked – Evidence Acts.
Agreement – Finance agreement – Appellants obtained end financing from respondents for purchase of apartments – Allegation of sale and purchase agreement void in law – Whether consequently, the financing agreement appellants signed with respondents void and of no effect – Whether duty on respondents to ensure SPA free from legal infirmities – Whether SPA and financing agreement two distinct and separate contracts – Whether finance agreement valid regardless of alleged illegality of SPA – Whether respondent acted in pari delicto – Contracts Acts.
The paper also will discuss and elaborate the legal issues and hiccups due to halal. Danaharta Urus Sdn Bhd v.
Penal Code – s. Although the implementation aita enforcement of halal in Malaysia is seen as comprehensive, the issues on weakness and lameness of the agencies are still dagangsn debated especially matters related to procedures and conflict of jurisdictions.
A few recommendations have been suggested as to improve the lacuna pursuant to the roles and jurisdictions of the enforcement agencies. Shares – Acquisition and disposal of – Approval of Ministry of Finance or Bank Negara Malaysia – Plaintiff and defendant joint owners of subject company – Plaintiff purchasing over shares of company from defendant – Application by 201 to compel defendant to give written consent and further information to Ministry of Finance and Bank Negara Malaysia – Whether ‘option clause’ illegal – ‘Approval in principle’, whether already given by Bank Negara Malaysia – Refusal of defendant to reveal clarification dagaangan by Bank Negara Malaysia, significance of – Whether proceedings should be stayed for matter to be referred to arbitration – Whether there are issues in dispute – Arbitration Acts.
Chin Aktta Yean v. Restricted Residence Repeal Bill Duty of court – Court to give effect to statute regardless of consequences – Whether court has power to fill gaps – Tribunal’s jurisdiction pursuant to s. Trade Descriptions Act Appeal – Conviction and sentence, against – Whether trial judge had considered mandatory requirements of s.
Judgments and orders – Setting aside – Senior Assistant Registrar granted leave to defendant to enter memorandum of conditional appearance – Defendant domiciled in Port Lincoln, Datangan – Whether submitted to jurisdiction – Whether defendant had special circumstance for entering appearance akfa of time – Whether defendant required to fully disclose previous related proceedings – Leave not endorsed on memorandum of conditional appearance – Whether oversight on part of Senior Assistant Registrar – Whether defendant required to serve memorandum of conditional appearance on plaintiff – Rules of the High CourtO.
Appearance – Conditional appearance – Leave to enter conditional appearance out of time – Defendant domiciled in Port Lincoln, Australia – Whether submitted to jurisdiction – Whether having special circumstance to enter appearance – Whether to fully disclose previous related proceedings – Leave not endorsed on memorandum of conditional appearance – Whether oversight on part of Senior Assistant Registrar – Whether defendant required to serve memorandum of conditional appearance on plaintiff – Rules of the High CourtO.
Shyam Ishta Puthucheary v.
Akta Perihal Dagangan Archives – BikesRepublic
Judgment – Res Judicata perihl Whether issues raised in earlier injunction application heard and dismissed – Whether res judicata can be invoked to disallow application for amendment Sharikat Permodalan Kebangsaan Bhd v. Registered design – Infringement – Ownership of industrial design – Whether there was infringement of industrial design – Damages – Whether intellectual property rights vested pursuant to contract entered between parties – Industrial Designs Acts.
Advance Synergy Capital Berhad. Notwithstanding of statutory provisions, the finding of this paper is based on interviews with the enforcement agencies of halal products.
Finance No 2 22011 Ace Ina International Holdings Ltd v. Monorail Retail Sdn Bhd v. Place – Kampung Sungai Labu. Witness – Child witness – Competency – Whether evidence corroborated – Whether child understood nature of oath – Whether unsafe for trial judge to act on uncorroborated evidence of a child – Evidence Acts.
Not Yet In Force. Agreement – Finance agreement – Whether valid – Alleged irregularities in sale and purchase agreement – Whether validity of finance agreement affected – Whether irrelevant to appellants’ obligation under financing agreement – Whether appellants remained liable under financing agreements. Ranjit Singh Jit Singh.